The 2025 Class of the Delta Leadership Program at the Port of Stockton on Feb. 7, 2025
STOCKTON, Calif. (Feb. 9, 2025) – The 2025 Class of the Delta Leadership Program spent Friday at the Port of Stockton interacting with state and regional water policy leaders and touring the port.
The program is a joint effort by the Delta Protection Commission and the Delta Leadership Foundation to support sustained leadership development in the region.
DLP participant Josh McMillon of Walnut GrovePanelist Nancy Vogel, Senior Water Policy Advisor to the Director, Department of Water ResourcesDLP participant Kathleen Schaefer of San AnselmoDLP participant Gerry Goodie Jr. of Walnut GroveDLP participant Lea Emmons II of TracyDLP participant Misty Kaltreider of FairfieldDLP participant Gerald Strootman of AcampoPanelist Sean Maguire, member of the State Water Resources Control BoardDLP participant LeighAnn Davis of BrentwoodDLP participant Ahmad Majid of StocktonDLP participant Lea Emmons II of TracyProgram facilitator Lisa Beutler and DLP participant Misty Kaltreider of FairfieldPort of Stockton Deputy Director Jeff Wingfield, a 2016 DLP alumPort of Stockton, by the numbersNina Hawk, Chief of Bay-Delta Resources, Metropolitan Water DistrictDLP participant Kirsten Pringle of SacramentoDLP participant Esther Mburu of StocktonPanelist John Herrick, Manager and General Counsel of the South Delta Water AgencyDLP participant Esther Mburu of Stockton
WEST SACRAMENTO, Calif. (Jan. 28, 2025) – Applications to fill five seats on the Delta Protection Advisory Committee (DPAC) opened today. The application deadline is 5 p.m. March 14, and the Delta Protection Commission is scheduled to make the appointments May 15.
Five Committee members’ terms expire in May 2025:
Delta Business (Seat 1) – Arron Pellarin, Village West Marina
Delta General Public (Seat 1) – Anna Swenson – Clarksburg
Delta Flood Entity – Chris Elias
Delta Conservation/Habitat NGO Entity – Jim Cox, CA Striped Bass Association
Delta Water Exporter – Russ Ryan, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
All are eligible to reapply.
DPAC provides recommendations to the Delta Protection Commission on diverse interests within the Delta. Committee members are expected to attend six meetings per year. DPAC typically meets on the first Tuesday of even-numbered months (February, April, June, August, October, and December), though meeting dates may occasionally shift. Meetings are held in the Delta at rotating locations.
Committee member terms are three years, so these terms will expire in 2028.
“The Delta Protection Commission developed a plan that promotes the continued appreciation and protection of the natural, historic, and cultural resources associated with the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta National Heritage Area, a place important to our nation’s history and heritage,” wrote Charles F. Sams III, Director of the National Park Service.
“We commend you for completing this well-conceived plan and for involving the interested Tribes, citizens, and organizations in the five counties of the Delta region.”
The Delta NHA, created by Congress in 2019 (PDF), is California’s first and only National Heritage Area. The Delta Protection Commission, a California state agency, was designated the local coordinating entity for the Delta NHA.
“We are grateful to Interior for its approval,” said DPC Executive Director Bruce Blodgett. “The Management Plan is critical for the success of the NHA, because it serves as a guide for the DPC and the NHA partnership network going forward.”
Diane Burgis, Chair of the Delta Protection Commission, also lauded Interior’s action. “The Delta is precious and fragile,” she said. “It is a national treasure, worthy of recognition, celebration, and protection. The approval of the Management Plan acknowledges that and assures us that we are on the right path.”
The NHA
The NHA’s boundary extends from Sacramento to Stockton to Vallejo with the junction of the Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers at its heart (see map below).
The Management Plan outlines five broad themes that will be celebrated as implementation moves forward:
Water: Precious Lifeblood for the Delta and California – The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta is California’s oasis, located at the center of the state’s water challenges and opportunities, and a water passage between the Pacific Ocean and inland California.
The Beating Heart of Natural California – The Delta lies at the center of California’s biological and physical environment, supporting numerous biologically diverse species and connecting California’s freshwater resources to the Pacific Ocean.
Abundance, Diversity, Resistance, and Survival – Native Americans in the Delta – Native Americans thrived in the Delta prior to European settlement, developing complex and diverse societies, deeply rooted in the landscape, that have endured despite existential threats such as disease and genocide.
The Delta Becomes California’s Cornucopia – Through capital, human labor, and technology, the Delta became one of the nation’s most productive agricultural regions, with the ability to grow a large variety of crops, farmed by large and small operations.
Cultural Influences of the Delta – Enduring Legacies of American, Asian, European, and Latin American Immigrants: Bringing their own ambition and skills to the Delta, cultural and ethnic communities from Asia, Europe, Latin America, and the United States shaped the region’s agriculture and industry during the late 19th Century and early 20th Century and continue to leave an indelible imprint on the landscape.
Next Steps
The Management Plan will go to the Commission for final approval in March.
—–
Media contact: Bruce Blodgett, Executive Director, Delta Protection Commission, (530) 650-6811 or bruce.blodgett@delta.ca.gov.
The 2025 Class of the Delta Leadership Program. Back row, L-R: Gerry Goodie Jr., Gregg McMillon, Ashley Seufzer, Megan Harrison, Amber McDowell, Ahmad Majid, Jack Cronin, Lea Emmons II, Lacy Berry, Misty Kaltreider, Heather Swinney, and Gerald Strootman. Front row, L-R: Josh McMillon, Kathleen Schaefer, Esther Mburu, Beatriz Portillo, Yuen Lenh, Kirsten Pringle, and LeighAnn Davis.
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (Jan. 10, 2025) – Nineteen emerging Delta leaders convened Friday at the Nature Conservancy in Sacramento for the kickoff of the 2025 Delta Leadership Program.
Run by the Delta Protection Commission and the Delta Leadership Foundation, the program is designed to build and support leadership within the Delta community. “We’re making you stronger leaders so the Delta is stronger,” Leadership Foundation President Mike Campbell told the group.
The group will gather four more times between now and April for daylong seminars that will provide deep dives into the Delta’s ecology, economy, heritage, regulatory framework, and more. Seminars will also hone participants’ leadership skills and serve as workshops for team projects that will be presented to the Delta Protection Commission on May 15.
This year’s participants are (a text-only list follows the photo gallery):
Lacy Berry (Clarksburg) – Community Volunteer, Town of ClarksburgJack Cronin (Rio Vista) – Assistant Engineer, Metropolitan Water DistrictLeighAnn Davis (Brentwood) – Executive Director, Contra Costa Co. Historical SocietyLea Emmons II (Tracy) – Water Operations Superintendent, City of TracyGerry Goodie Jr. (Walnut Grove) – Manager/Owner, Wimpy’s MarinaMegan Harrison (Livermore) – District Planner, California Department of Parks and RecreationMisty Kaltreider (Fairfield) – Water & Natural Resources Manager, County of SolanoYuen Lenh (Sacramento) – Water Rights Engineer, MBK EngineersAhmad Majid (Stockton) – Watershed Protection Advocate, Stockton-area community organizationsEsther Mburu (Stockton) – Carbon Policy Analyst, Restore the DeltaAmber McDowell (Walnut Grove) – Executive Director, Sacramento County Farm BureauGregg McMillon (Sacramento) – Water Resources Engineer, California Department of Water ResourcesJosh McMillon (Walnut Grove) – Community Volunteer, Town of Walnut GroveBeatriz Portillo (Martinez) – Senior Emergency Planning Coordinator, Contra Costa County Office of Emergency ServicesKirsten Pringle (Sacramento) – Project Manager, MBK EngineersKathleen Schaefer (San Anselmo) – Clerk, Delta Region Geologic Hazard Abatement DistrictAshley Seufzer (Sacramento) – Program Manager, Audubon CaliforniaGerald Strootman (Acampo) – Ag and Commercial Lender, F&M BankHeather Swinney (Sacramento) – Deputy Project Leader, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, also an ex officio member of the Delta Protection Advisory Committee
Lacy Berry (Clarksburg) – Community Volunteer, Town of Clarksburg
Jack Cronin (Rio Vista) – Assistant Engineer, Metropolitan Water District
LeighAnn Davis (Brentwood) – Executive Director, Contra Costa Co. Historical Society
Lea Emmons II (Tracy) – Water Operations Superintendent, City of Tracy
Gerry Goodie Jr. (Walnut Grove) – Manager/Owner, Wimpy’s Marina
Megan Harrison (Livermore) – District Planner, California Department of Parks and Recreation
Misty Kaltreider (Fairfield) – Water & Natural Resources Manager, County of Solano
Yuen Lenh (Sacramento) – Water Rights Engineer, MBK Engineers
Ahmad Majid (Stockton) – Watershed Protection Advocate, Stockton-area community organizations
Esther Mburu (Stockton) – Carbon Policy Analyst, Restore the Delta
Amber McDowell (Walnut Grove) – Executive Director, Sacramento County Farm Bureau
Gregg McMillon (Sacramento) – Water Resources Engineer, California Department of Water Resources
Josh McMillon (Walnut Grove) – Community Volunteer, Town of Walnut Grove
Beatriz Portillo (Martinez) – Senior Emergency Planning Coordinator, Contra Costa County Office of Emergency Services
The Delta Protection Commission reviews hundreds of local and regional land use projects in the Primary and Secondary zones of the Delta for consistency with the Land Use and Resource Management Plan (PDF) and submits comment letters to ensure projects stay on track with the Plan. Under state law (Public Resources Code Sections 29770-29772), any action taken by a local government or agency in the Primary Zone that is inconsistent with the Plan can be appealed to the Commission. Appeals may be brought by any interested person, or by the Commission itself. Learn more here.
January 7, 2025
Eva Bush, Environmental Program Manager
Delta Stewardship Council
715 P Street, 15-300
Sacramento, CA 95814
Transmitted electronically via email
Dear Ms. Bush,
I am providing comments on the proposed rulemaking the Delta Stewardship Council (Council) is conducting to amend their regulations that govern certifications of consistency with the Delta Plan. The following comments represent my views and the views of my staff and have not been formally endorsed by the Delta Protection Commission itself.
The Delta Protection Commission (Commission) is a California state agency created by the Delta Protection Act of 1992, which declared “the Delta is a natural resource of statewide, national, and international significance, containing irreplaceable resources, and it is the policy of the state to recognize, preserve and protect those resources of the Delta for the use and enjoyment of current and future generations” (California Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 29701). My comments reflect the role of our agency in pursuing that policy directive.
Concerns Regarding Setback Levees
The existing regulations prioritize the consideration of setback levees to increase floodplains and riparian habitat (Cal. Code Regs., Title 23, Section 5008). The proposed change in the rulemaking goes further than the existing regulatory text. The amended regulation for the same section reads as follows: “A certification of consistency for a project subject to this section that is located in the setback levee evaluation areas depicted in Appendix 8A shall evaluate, and the levee project where feasible shall incorporate, alternatives that would increase floodplains and riparian habitats” (emphasis added).
We are concerned with this regulation for a variety of reasons. First, considered in the context of the goal of increasing floodplain and riparian habitat, this requirement will diminish landside agriculture, where it is implemented. Preservation of agriculture is a co-equal goal of the Delta Reform Act (Water Code Section 85020(b)). Preservation of agriculture is also a priority under the Delta Protection Act (PRC Section 28702(b)). To the extent that setback levees will encroach on agricultural land uses and diminish that acreage, this policy will result in the reduction of agricultural land use. We believe this is inconsistent with the policy goal of protection of agriculture while also restoring habitat adopted by the State of California. Agriculture is an important driver of the Delta economy, and the Delta Protection Act also directs the Delta Protection Commission to work to enhance the sustainability of that economy (PRC Section 29759). In addition, the reduction of agricultural land use will diminish the revenues generated from agriculture. This has several associated consequences. First, it reduces the revenues available to local landowners that are subject to special benefit assessments required by reclamation districts and also reduces the tax base of the region. This means the reduction in acreage by necessity diminishes funds available for levee maintenance and other public services that depend on taxes. Second, the reduction in agricultural land use has an adverse impact on the sustainability of the Delta economy. A dollar of agricultural crop revenue generates three to five times greater regional income than other leading revenue sources such as recreation or tourism (Delta Protection Commission 2012:274). Thus, the proposed regulation would contribute to the incremental loss of agricultural land and the reduction of economic sustainability in the Delta.
In stating that the project “where feasible shall incorporate” alternatives using setback levees, the Council may be imposing a substantive duty on covered actions subject to this section to either use setback levees or demonstrate infeasibilty. Levee maintenance and upgrade work is already a highly regulated activity that requires a significant level of expenditure for permitting and environmental review above and beyond capital costs that go directly to physical improvements. A typical levee project in the Delta may be subject to other alternatives analysis requirements such as the duty to consider alternatives under the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Code Regs., Title 14, Section 15126.6). In addition, where an individual permit is needed for fill of Waters of the United States, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers also conducts a rigorous screening of alternatives (40 C.F.R. Section 230.10). These processes are, in turn, only a small fraction of the total regulatory burden required for levee maintenance or upgrade projects. The levee maintaining agency thus faces a formidable burden of compliance with a range of laws that may require different and conflicting substantive decisions. Because levee work is typically funded in large part via special benefit assessments imposed by reclamation districts, the cost of the additional regulatory burden of compliance will primarily be borne by local landowners subject to those assessments. Finally, this policy may require reclamation districts or other levee maintaining agencies to acquire relatively expensive landside real estate to accommodate a shift in the levee footprint to the landside to comply with your regulations.
Concerns Regarding Urban Levee Projects
The proposed rulemaking also amends the requirements for certain urban levees (Cal. Code Regs., Title 23, Section 5008). The amended text reads “a certification of consistency for a project subject to this section that is an urban levee improvement project in the cities of Sacramento or West Sacramento shall evaluate alternatives that would modify all or a portion of the original levee prism to physically expand the width of the channel.” For similar reasons, we are concerned with the imposition of additional layers of regulation upon levee maintenance. The regulatory burden faced by levee maintaining agencies is already complex and formidable. In addition, levee projects that increase channel width may require acquisition of relatively expensive landside real estate that imposes additional costs beyond capital expenditures that go directly to the primary goal of providing flood protection.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment. We look forward to providing future input.
Sincerely,
Bruce Blodgett,
Executive Director
CC: Diane Burgis, Chair
Commissioners
References Cited
Delta Protection Commission. Economic Sustainability Plan for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. 2012. West Sacramento, California.
Use .highlight class with .panel-standout for triangle effect. Integer posuere erat a ante venenatis dapibus posuere velit aliquet. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus. Curabitur blandit tempus porttitor. Integer posuere erat a ante venenatis dapibus posuere velit aliquet. Cras justo odio, dapibus ac facilisis in, egestas eget quam. Aenean eu leo quam. Pellentesque ornare sem lacinia quam venenatis vestibulum.
Panel (Standout)
Integer posuere erat a ante venenatis dapibus posuere velit aliquet. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus. Curabitur blandit tempus porttitor. Integer posuere erat a ante venenatis dapibus posuere velit aliquet. Cras justo odio, dapibus ac facilisis in, egestas eget quam. Aenean eu leo quam. Pellentesque ornare sem lacinia quam venenatis vestibulum.
Panel (Default)
Integer posuere erat a ante venenatis dapibus posuere velit aliquet. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus. Curabitur blandit tempus porttitor. Integer posuere erat a ante venenatis dapibus posuere velit aliquet. Cras justo odio, dapibus ac facilisis in, egestas eget quam. Aenean eu leo quam. Pellentesque ornare sem lacinia quam venenatis vestibulum.